On the Effectiveness of CVT Promotion Measures within the Enterprises in Europe
ABSTRACT
In achieving the targets of Lisbon Declaration
of the EU, the advancement and effectiveness of CVT in the enterprises is considered
as an essential core of LLL and the means to ensure continuous development and
adaptation of skills and competencies to the requirements of moving towards a
competitive knowledge-based economy.
The first section is mainly concerned with the
analysis of funding-related policies, which are either supply or demand-led
measures. The traditional supply-led funding measures are usually undertaken
and regulated by public authorities (at national or regional levels in
collaboration with social and sectoral partners) with the aim of guaranteeing a
minimum CVT provision and funding for the enterprises and individuals. However,
due to budget constraints, the enterprises’ dissatisfaction with the
involuntary character of levy/funding schemes and the raising training costs,
there is an increasing shift towards the use of demand-led funding measures to
stimulate the enterprises and the individuals’ investment in CVT. They can be either
“universal” or targeted demand-led measures. Examples of the “universal” (or
non-specifically targeted) schemes are examined with special reference to the
case of “leave of self-directed CVT and learning” which is addressed in
principle to all individuals as it is the case with the French “CIF” scheme.
The second category of demand-led funding
measures, targeting specific categories of enterprises and groups of
individuals is exemplified by three cases of voucher-based funding schemes: The
training accounts scheme in Austria, the regional training voucher scheme
(“chèque de formation” for SMEs in Wallonia, Belgium) and the “ILA” (individual
learning accounts) scheme in the UK. The second section of the paper is an
overview of the evaluation studies of measures fostering vocational training
from the perspective of three basic stakeholders: enterprises, employees and
public authorities (in Europe and outside
The third section is an attempt to put together
the basic elements for an “input-outcome” evaluation framework to be further
developed and tested in ulterior stages of CVTS2 project. It is a two-level
multi-indicator evaluation framework linking “input-measures” fostering CVT to
their “outcomes” through a two-level
evaluation process in terms of a set of quantitative and qualitative
performance indicators: “primary” (or intermediate) and “end-outcome” performance
evaluation indicators.
The concluding section highlights some overall trends in CVT performance evaluation results and their implications for policy recommendation and further research development in the domain.
- Paper 162
-
- M'Hamed Dif_ECER2005Paper162.pdf
-
258.34 Kb
M'Hamed Dif, University Louis Pasteur of Strasbourg
- Paper 162 - Presentation
-
- M.Dif-ECER2005Paper162_Presentation.pdf
-
87.73 Kb
M'Hamed Dif, University Louis Pasteur of Strasbourg